Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a score of 91.3 against 76. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a screen with the same size, the same pixel density and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G's battery performance is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Neo one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.