Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's global score of 76. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Neo.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a little bit better pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW and OPPO Find X3 Neo count with quite similar batteries duration.
Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a little bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.