Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a score of 98.9 against 76. Even being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a quite smaller display, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Neo one.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.