Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's design is still a little lighter.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has faster video frame rate, a much higher resolution back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.