Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a overall score of 88.3 against 76. The Galaxy S10 is a lighter device than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a way lower screen pixel density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 32% larger battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.