Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's global score of 76. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but both of them are equally thin.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a lot better 50 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy S10 5G and OPPO Find X3 Neo feature quite similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo and Galaxy S10 5G feature similar batteries.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.