Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's overall score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a somewhat lighter phone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy S10e has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.