Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a 79.5 score against 76. The Galaxy S7 is a lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy S7 counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a lot smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and better video frame rates. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.