Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 83.3 score against 76. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lot older and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's body is still lighter. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a way lower pixels number per inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.