Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 975.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having an 88.5 score against 76. Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller display. The Galaxy Z Flip has a processing unit that's just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Neo one, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and OPPO Find X3 Neo count with incredibly similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.