Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a 94.6 score against 76. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide identical OS features. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Find X3 Neo were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is notably heavier but also thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Neo. They have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the OPPO Find X3 Neo, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a battery duration that's just as good as OPPO Find X3 Neo's battery life.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.