Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better phone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must note that it is also older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a higher resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.