Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with an 81.1 score against 76. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device than OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a little better screen density. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.