Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a general score of 79 against 76. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is older, thicker and heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a bit better pixels density.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots a little bit better photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with less megapixels, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little better battery life than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.