Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 global score. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3168px resolution. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much larger sensor and faster video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.