Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 is an extremely older phone than OPPO Find X6 Pro, but it's a lot lighter and thinner anyway. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better 1440 x 3168px resolution, a bigger display and a bit higher pixel density.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 3 has a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.