Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. These devices use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Although the Google Pixel 3a is much older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is thinner and noticeably lighter.
The Google Pixel 3a features an extremely better processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has better video frame rate, a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.