Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with an 81.9 score against 72.7. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 4 is much older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite better screen pixel density, a bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera and higher video frame rates.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.