Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 72.7. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4a is way older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much better hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bigger display and a better 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X6 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.