Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a global score of 87.5 against 72.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a little bit greater pixel density.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.