Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 512 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a global score of 77.7 against 72.7. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Even though HTC One M9 is notably older and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is still noticeably lighter.
The HTC One M9 has a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a bit better looking display than HTC One M9, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a much bigger display.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.