Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's general score of 72.7. Even though HTC U Ultra is incredibly older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is notably lighter and thinner. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
HTC U Ultra features a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores (although faster). HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.