Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 512 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a global score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's general score of 72.7. HTC U11's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released 6 years before. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a better looking display than HTC U11, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. HTC U11 has a much better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a greater camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.