Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, with an 84.3 score against 72.7. The LG G8 ThinQ body is a bit thinner and extremely lighter than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version, so it provides you some additional features.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features just a bit better display than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with way more brightness, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a quite larger screen. LG G8 ThinQ counts with an extremely better processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro takes better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.