Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a 77.2 score against 72.7. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but LG Q8 has newer 7.0 Nougat version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13, providing you some nice extra features. The LG Q8 construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
LG Q8 counts with a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a brighter screen than LG Q8, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a much larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and way more brightness.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a camera with a lot higher resolution, better video frame rates and a way bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better battery duration than LG Q8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.