Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 general score. LG V10's design is lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it was released 8 years before. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a little bit better screen than LG V10, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. LG V10 counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V10 counts with a much better hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser CPU cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a really longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 60 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.