Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 overall score. These devices have Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. The LG V30S ThinQ is an notably older device than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but it's way lighter and thinner anyway.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a better looking display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a little bit bigger display. LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much faster processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.