Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 general score. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is extremely older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really superior performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a quite larger screen. LG V35 ThinQ has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera in the back, a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rates.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.