Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Despite of the fact that the LG V40 ThinQ is extremely older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and thinner.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a brighter display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168. LG V40 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a really longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.