Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 72.7. LG Velvet's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much sharper screen than LG Velvet, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a higher pixels count in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The LG Velvet has a very superior processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a more mega-pixels camera, a lot larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and better 60 fps video frame rate.
LG Velvet features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.