Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Meteor grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a older and just a little bit heavier phone than OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Nokia managed to build it just a little thinner anyway.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better performing processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better display pixel density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.