Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13, so it provides the user some extra features. Although the nubia Red Magic 3S is older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a lot better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a little bigger display.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a better 50 MP resolution, a much larger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's storage for applications and games is just as good as OPPO Find X6 Pro's one, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a battery duration that is very similar to OPPO Find X6 Pro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.