Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a general score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a better phone than OPPO Find X6 Pro, we must tell that it is also a much older, just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier phone. Both devices in this review have Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has an extremely better processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch of display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a much brighter display.
The nubia Red Magic 5S captures slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with much more MP. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.