Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a general score of 79.9 against 72.7. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy A25 5G design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even when they were released only a couple months apart.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a bit larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and much more brightness.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, a same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G and OPPO Find X6 Pro have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.