Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's general score of 72.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is way older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is somewhat thinner and much lighter. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a much powerful processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a lot higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.