Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13. The Galaxy A50s construction is much lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features an extremely better processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite larger screen, a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The Galaxy A50s has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.