Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 72.7. The Samsung Galaxy A51 construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a greater pixel count in each inch of screen, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a quite larger display.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a camera with more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.