Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a general score of 90.8 against 72.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is a little thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a greater display density.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, higher video frame rate, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.