Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is way better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13. Galaxy A52s's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it was released about 19 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52s and OPPO Find X6 Pro count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A52s has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video resolution, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.