Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A6 is notably older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is thinner and way lighter. The Galaxy A6 has a much more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a way better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a way better pixels count per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X6 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.