Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is just a little thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a higher screen density and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots clearer photos and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.