Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has a general score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's overall score of 72.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A8 (2018) is notably older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is way lighter and a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a way better screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a little better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a much better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a much higher 50 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.