Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's general score of 72.7. These phones work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system). Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and a little lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.