Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. The Galaxy Note 3 is an notably older device than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but it's a little thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 has an extremely better CPU than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a larger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.