Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's overall score of 72.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Even though the Galaxy Note 5 is noticeably older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a bigger screen.
OPPO Find X6 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments, a much higher 50 MP resolution camera and a much bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.