Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a global score of 80.4 against 72.7. Even though the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is extremely older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a larger screen. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a way higher resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.