Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a lot older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a higher pixels density and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much powerful CPU than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.