Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, having a overall score of 80.2 against 72.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is a lot lighter and thinner. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note5 features a very superior processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.