Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a score of 83, which is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 general score. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Note8 is an way older phone than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Samsung could make it just a bit lighter and a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a much better performing processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a better looking screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, better video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.