Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's overall score of 72.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a much older and a little bit heavier device than OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Samsung made it a bit thinner anyway. These devices work with the same Android 13 OS, so both should provide you all the same OS features.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 12 GB RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X6 Pro. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.